Do arbitrators really understand all the highly complex factual questions they are faced with? Are arbitrators really in a position to appreciate what parties and their highly-paid experts tell them, and to distinguish between actual argument and mere smoke screen? Or are they rather often overwhelmed by all the technical detail? And if they are: should/may/must tribunals retain the services of a technical expert who assists them in understanding the technical complexities, who guides them on how to read factual submissions, and who helps them prepare for the hearing? Or is this another cost drain and entirely inadmissible?
Die neue DIS Veranstaltungsreihe - online
Lunch DIScussions: Technical Expert to the Arbitral Tribunal?
Date: 13 October 2022, 1.00-2.00 pm
For further details and information, please refer to the programme.
Registration
Please register by 11 October 2022 via the link below. Registered participants will receive the access details by e-mail prior to the begin of the event.
Participation in the event is free of charge.
Link to registration
Please address any questions to events(at)disarb.org.
Finally, you are cordially invited to create further Lunch DIScussions yourself.
Please simply contact us by email with your suggestions: events(at)disarb.org.